War Crimes Geneva Conventions Protection of Civilians Violations Occupation Law International Court of Justice Civilian Protection Genocide Convention Occupying Powers Maritime Law Genocide Legal Obligations Aid Regulations UN Resolutions Refugee Law Rights of Detainees Conflict Resolution Civilians in Conflict Rights of Civilians Prisoner Rights Refugee Rights Blockades War Crimes Law Compliance War Crimes Accountability Conflict Law Accountability Military Operations Asylum Law Violations of Law Protection of Journalists Rights of Refugees Military Law Violations of Human Rights Civilians Protection War Law Violations of Humanitarian Law Peacekeeping Operations Military Actions Legal Proceedings NGO Regulations Warfare Regulations Aid Access Arms Exports Military Engagements Child Protection Rights of Occupied Peoples Legal Challenges Rights of Hostages Accountability Mechanisms Armed Conflict Red Cross Operations Crimes Against Humanity Human Rights Rights of Individuals Blockade Laws Arms Control Legal Frameworks Criminal Law Arms Embargo Prisoner Treatment Aid Obligations Conflict Zones Use of Force Rights of Activists Genocide Prevention Geneva Convention UN Regulations Court Rulings NGO Compliance Migration Law Arms Trade Treaty Self-Defense Foreign Assistance Act Rules of Engagement International Criminal Court Landmines Sovereignty Court Proceedings Rights of Organizations Genocide Accusations Atrocity Crimes Treaties Aid Operations Legal Cases Blockade Regulations Arms Treaties Legal Advice Legal Accountability Arms Export Regulations Legal Actions Deportation Law NGO Operations Sanctions Law Rights of Migrants Red Cross Laws of War Export Controls Impartiality Rules Ceasefire Agreements
COGAT defends the data‑sharing rules as security measures with limited impact.
