Particle.news

Supreme Court Sends Baby-Food Lawsuit Back to Texas in 9–0 Jurisdiction Ruling

The justices said federal courts lacked diversity jurisdiction because the parents and Whole Foods are Texas citizens.

Overview

  • The unanimous opinion by Justice Sonia Sotomayor affirms the Fifth Circuit and holds the district court lacked jurisdiction when the case was removed.
  • The suit by Sarah and Grant Palmquist alleges their child was harmed by heavy metals in Hain baby food purchased at Whole Foods, and the merits remain unresolved.
  • The district court had dismissed Whole Foods as improperly joined and later found the Palmquists failed to prove causation, but the Fifth Circuit vacated and ordered remand.
  • The Supreme Court concluded the erroneous dismissal of Whole Foods did not cure the jurisdictional defect, distinguishing the Caterpillar exception.
  • Justice Clarence Thomas concurred to question the century‑old improper‑joinder doctrine and urged the Court to revisit it in a future case.